|
An Archaeological Study of the Memorial Stones in the Kirkyard of Govan Old Parish Church
By
Catherine Cutmore, M.A.
Background to the Survey of the Memorial Stones
During the summer of 1995, two projects were carried out in the churchyard.
The first was a survey of the monuments in the churchyard and a comparison
with the older monuments within the church in order to explain why the older
stones were reused, who adopted them, and why this occurred in the 17th and
18th centuries. The second project was to record in detail all the monuments
in the churchyard. The survey shows there are fourteen 17th century stones,
eighty-three 18th century stones, six pre-1809 stones, one hundred and thirty-two
remaining 19th century stones, one 20th century stone and one mediaeval monument.
The Mitchell Library in Glasgow holds records in relation to Govan Parish Church
only from 1855[1]. The absence of a complete earlier record meant that the
main sources of information about the use of the cemetery prior to the 18th
century were the monuments themselves[2]. Two previous studies of the
churchyard ( 1809 and 1936 ) have been discussed by Willsher ( 1992 ). Kyle's
1809 plan provided valuable information on the owners of the lairs and the
people that erected the monuments. The survey carried out in 1936 provided
additional information relating to these early monuments, such as their
occupation and place of residence. The 1996 survey of the surviving 17th
and 18th century monuments contributed additional significant details of
monument form and inscription content ( Cutmore, 1996 ). When all the
information from the three surveys had been collected and analysed, a
comparison between the monuments in the churchyard and the early mediaeval
monuments was made, paying particular attention to the people using the
monuments. These people were the key to understanding the growth of the
graveyard and the re-use of the older monuments.
The Historical Context
The history of Govan shows it was a place of innovation and the centre of
new ideas in the 18th century and the same can be said of its religious
history. In the 16th century, the people who lived and farmed the land all
around Govan had paid rent in cash or kind to the diocese of Glasgow. After
the reformation, many of these "rentallers" became possessors of their land
in payment of a feu. These new "heritiors" included many family names which
are seen on the later stones, for example, Gilmour, Anderson, Murdoch, Stevine,
Gibson, Rowand, Sellare and Hill. Most of these were ordinary people who worked
the land. It is these names and those of subsequent generations which appear
on the plans and many of the monuments in the churchyard.
From the 17th century and into the 18th century, the people of Govan earned
their living from agriculture and salmon fishing. The area was rural and the
people working the land were also the proprietors, in many cases on land
passed on through generations from the earliest recorded rentallers. According
to Brotchie ( 1938, p.87 ), the Rowan family dominated many sections of
Govan society from 1700-1800.
In 1756, The Weavers Society was formed and the contract ( charter ) is
signed by John Rowane, George Napier, William Walker, James Rouand of
Heatheryhall, John Dreghorn, James Barr, Patrick Houston, John Rowan and
Robert Rowan. The purpose of the society was to support each other in hard
times, but membership was not restricted to the weavers. Many of the names
also appear on the plans and monuments. From these documents, and the monuments,
it is apparent that the craftsmen working in Govan at this time included
shoemakers or cordiners, tailors, wrights, smiths and handloom weavers.
The name Maxwell, Hill, Gibson and Rowan are also connected with Glasgow and
were often professional businessmen as well as landowners. The Maxwells of
Pollok, members of the nobility, had owned large parts of Govan from the 13th
century. The Rowan family were the original owners of Bellahouston estate.
Moses Stevine later bought the lands of Dumbreck, combined them, and changed
the name of Dumbreck estate to Bellahouston. Many of the original land holdings
of the 16th century heritors were combined in this way, forming a few very
large estates from many smaller properties.
The Oswalds acquired Shieldhall ( Scotstoun, Auchincreuve and Moore Park ).
They were a family of successful businessmen, merchants, politicians and
clerics. Their businesses and town houses were in Glasgow and their Govan
estates could be described as their "country houses". Gradually, the Oswalds
were seen less in association with Govan and more with Glasgow. The Oswalds
were businessmen who had simply acquired country houses and estates. On the
other hand, the Rowan family were one of the original Govan families,
owning many of the original properties. The last in their possession was
Holmfauldhead.
Another of the original Heritors Thomas Hill owned the estate of Ibrox. The
estate remained in the family until the middle of the 18th century, when it
was divided and sold to John Picken and the Graham family. The Grahams sold
their portion to John Trotter, a Glasgow merchant who built a mansionhouse
called Myrtlemount.
Around 1700, the lands of Plantation estate were put together from several
smaller estates including Craigiehall. It was, in fact, known as Craigiehall
from 1701 to 1783 when it was bought by John Robertson, a Glasgow merchant,
who owned a sugar and cotton plantation in the West Indies and it became
known as Plantation. The estate was sold ten years later to John Mair, a
mason from Paisley.
Therefore, although many of the smaller properties given to the heritors
were merged in the 17th century, many were still owned by the Heritors or
their families. In the 18th century, and earlier, while some of the original
families still owned property, people like the Glasgow merchants were able
to buy the larger estates which were combined to form very large properties
like Moor Park and Plantation. In other cases, the Govan families sold parts
of their land for the building of country houses by the Glasgow merchants,
for example, Cessnock.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, the landowners included the Maxwells of
Pollok, the Gibsons of Hillhead, the Hills of Ibrox and the Rowans and
Stevens of Bellahouston. The Maxwells were from the nobility and held titles
but the Gibsons, Hills, Rowans and Stevens were basically ordinary people.
The merchants and businessmen who owned the country estates around Govan may
have been rich and powerful in their own right, but another powerful asset
was membership of certain families. As Glasgow became more powerful, it
drew some of these people away, but the Rowans retained their ties with
Govan. This family's roots were firmly planted in Govan soil. They may not
have had the titles of the Maxwells, but their position within Govan society
must have been very great. The Rowans were, in effect, the Govan gentry.
The Previous Surveys
The plan of 1809 was valuable for tracing the continuity of ownership of the
lairs within families. It also showed that almost half the lairs contained
monuments including those owned by the Rowan family and the Bellahouston
estates. The first stones marked family lairs but pressure on the cemetery
grew to the point where the Heritors had to have a detailed plan drawn up in
1809 ( Davidson Kelly in Ritchie 1994, pp.5-6 ). D. M. Colquhoun's plan of
Govan churchyard based on a survey of the monuments made in 1936 drawing upon
Kyle's 1809 plan shows weaving to be the most common occupation. Ten monuments
were noted which had been erected by weavers while a further forty one weavers
had no monument. Sixteen farmers are noted, eight without monuments and
eight with monuments. Nine portioners ( landowners / farmers ) are noted,
eight with monuments. The pre-1809 monuments include a Baronet, a farmer,
a gardener, merchant, shoemaker, publican, printer, sergeant in the Scot's
Fusiliers, tailer, three weavers and four portioners.
The places of residence listed on the plan show the area served by the cemetery.
The three areas most commonly mentioned are Govan, Partick and Glasgow. Govan
residents include one merchant, the remainder being weavers. Weavers are also
recorded in Partick. The conclusion is that most people using the cemetery
lived locally. Weavers resided in both Govan and Partick. Merchants, on the
other hand, tended to have their main place of residence in Glasgow, possibly
where they were in business. They were perhaps buried in Govan in the
vicinity of their country residences.
The 1995 Survey
Copies of the 1995 survey ( which involved making a complete catalogue of
all the surviving stones ) have been lodged at Govan Old Parish Church,
Glasgow City Archives and the National Monuments Record of Scotland in
Edinburgh. The following observations summarise the results of that survey.
Monument Types
The latest mediaeval monument is a grave slab which still lies in the
churchyard and dates to c.15th century. It is the last of the mediaeval
monuments. The oldest of the early modern monuments is a flatstone dated
1624. The survey has revealed there are no monuments which date between these
two monuments. The absence of memorial monuments does not imply that the
graveyard was not being used, simply that monuments were not commissioned or
have not survived. There are three basic types at Govan. The horizontal
monuments, the vertical monuments and the mural monuments. The vertical
monuments include headstones, pedestal tombs, obelisks, a columnn and a revival
Celtic cross. A long low grave marker commonly known as a "double-bedder"
defines one side of the burial plot, or lair. The horizontal monuments consist
of flatstones and table stones.
From the seventeenth century onwards, the headstone monument appears in the
churchyard in conjunction with the earlier flat memorial of mediaeval type,
which was popular with the artisans who had only begun to use memorial
monuments. In the 17th century, the flatstone and the headstone were the only
monuments in use. The early headstones were small and were mainly used as
markers or ownership of lairs and did not commemorate individuals. From the end
of the 18th century, new types of monument were introduced, but the headstone
remained the most popular in Scotland and started to be commemorative.
Both flatstones and headstones continued in use througout the 18th and 19th
centuries, but the size of the headstones increased. Later in the 19th century,
the mural monuments and obelisk types appear in the churchyard while the
flatstone was modified into the stone table. Headstones became more complex
and some were made in two or more pieces.
17th Century Monuments
These stones are invaluable to clarify the decline and growth of prominent
and aristocratic families. The 17th century monuments include two headstones
and twelve flatstones. One group of three monuments shows the lair passed
through marriage from Thomas Ralph's daughter to her son, a Robertson who
erected a tablestone in the 19th century. Another sequence of four belonging
to the Algie family include two flatstones, one of which is a 17th century
pedestal monument. These two families used the graveyard from at least the
17th century to the 19th century and erected monuments which represent
several generations of their family.
A flatstone belonging to the Rowan family is the earliest of the monuments
and seems to be the earliest in the churchyard. Another stands in a lair with a
further two monuments, a flatstone and a tablestone, which both commemorate
the Gibson family. The latest of the group is the tablestone and with the
others shows this family were using the churchyard from at least 1699 to 1887.
Six of the flatstones, including two of the earliest, commemorate members of
the Rowan family. One monument also records John Rouan's marriage to a Gibson
and their grandson's marriage to Janet Anderson. The name Anderson, Gibson
and Rowan appear very frequently on the monuments along with those of Algie,
Colquhoun and Hill. All of these families were prominent in Govan from at
least the 17th century.
It appears that the numbers of Algies and Hills declined in the district
during the 19th century whereas the Andersons and Colquhouns increased. The
Andersons and Gibsons may have been wealthy as indicated in the number of
monuments which they erected. However, the prominence of the Rowan family,
as shown in the number of lairs and monuments, especially in the 17th and
18th centuries suggests that they also had a significant role in the
community.
The study of the plans and monument locations reveals that there are clusters
of family groups with the Rowans dominating the graveyard. It is possible that
this family may also have dominated the community in the post-mediaeval
centuries.
The 18th Century Monuments
The 18th century monuments include a tablestone belonging to John Trotter,
a Glasgow merchant and it is the earliest of the tablestones which became
popular in the 19th century. The remaining monuments consist of flatstones
and headstones. One of the three decorated with a coat-of-arms belongs to
Maxwell of Pollok, a Baronet and, as such, a member of the nobility, while
another belongs to a weaver.
The names which occur most frequently in the 18th century are those of
Anderson, Gibson and Hill, each appearing on two monuments. The name Algie
appears on one monument, while the name Rowan appears on nine monuments.
There are fifty-four headstones varying in decoration, inscription and
size. Six of the 18th century headstones are decorated with trade symbols.
Sixteen contains symbols of mortality or immortality, five of which belong
to a gardener, portioner, hammerman and a weaver. Ten of the monuments
recorded an occupation such as gardener, portioner, smith, cordiner, baker,
miller, farmer, printer and calico printer. A further four occupations were
noted from the trade emblems on the monuments, i.e., weaver, hammerman,
baker and slater.
Decoration
There are three main types of decoration on the churchyard monuments. The
first is symbolic, which includes emblems of mortality, immortality and trade.
The second type is architectural and the third is heraldic. Symbolic decoration
is a feature of many of the 17th and 18th century monuments. Most of the
decoration appears on the headstones, but a small number of flatstones contain
symbolic decoration.
In the 18th century, the artisans began to erect monuments, prior to that,
only the elite used stone monuments. They began by using the more "humble"
flatstone and smaller headstones to avoid comparison with those of the
gentry. Many of these artisans, especially the master craftsmen, managed to
convey their own importance by erecting monuments which were decorated with
emblems of their trade. The emblems seen on the monuments are normally
elements of the coat-of-arms of the appropriate incorporation or trades guild
and are therefore usually tools of the trade.
At Govan, the major mediaeval trades were all represented. The hammermen,
which included anyone who worked with a hammer on metal, for example,
blacksmiths, silversmiths, goldsmiths and gunsmiths. The cordiners, or
shoewrights, were members of this high status trade. The incorporation of
wrights includes those who worked with the square and compass, as well as
coopers and slaters. At Govan, this trade is represented by a memorial
decorated with a slater's hammer. There are also dysters, bleachers and
walkmillers, all associated with the weaving trade. One monument belonging
to a dyster is decorated with a dyster's press.
Symbols of mortality such as the skull and crossbones were used as a "momento
mori" to remind the living that they too would die by representing aspects of
death. On the other hand, symbols of immortality emphasise belief in life
after death: the separation of the soul from the body, the hope of the
resurrection and the promise of heaven. These themes are represented by the
cherub's head or winged soul, which represents the soul separated from the
body ascending to heaven.
Architectural decoration was also popular on the monuments. From 1760-1790,
many of the great country houses were built in a classical manner which
echoed the experience of the aristocracy. In the graveyard, this is seen in
representations of Greek vases on top of the pedestals and columns as
finials. At Govan, the finials have been destroyed. However, early photographs
of the graveyard show they were abundant ( Spalding, 1984 ). Many of the
features of both classical and Gothic architecture are reflected in the
graveyard monuments. Round columns, square Roman piers and various forms of
capitals are used to support the tablestones. Columns and capitals are also
seen on the headstones while columns are used in their own right, often
represented as broken ruins.
In the 19th century, wrought iron was a common feature of architecture. This
too is reflected in the cemeteries. Iron railings were used to mark out the
lairs. Earlier photographs of the cemetery show they were used in Govan in
great numbers. The 19th century print of the churchyard by moonlight[3] ( Plate 1 )
shows the wrought iron grilles quite well. Today, almost none survive.
|
Plate 1: Govan Parish Church by moonlight |
The third type of decoration is heraldic. According to Thomas Innes ( 1934 ),
the Scottish nation with its Celtic culture and clansip encouraged heraldry.
It is principally used as a means of identification. The condition of the
stones at Govan are very worn. In most cases, only the shield can be seen, but
generally only traces of decoration survive making it difficult to determine
if the shield is a true coat-of-arms or trade motif. Many of the trades
incorporations used heraldic devices. The Gibson tablestone, for example,
has a shield, traces of a crest or mantle and a motto, but it is now illegible.
Usually only the broadest symbols can be read, such as the saltire.
Inscriptions
The inscriptions on the headstones at Govan are very useful. The lettering
can often be used to date a monument. The oldest of the post-Reformation
monuments is dated 1624, the first burial in that lair being 1614. However,
prior to 1616 inscriptions were written around the edge of the stone
( Willsher, 1990, p.38 ). There are two monuments with illegible, marginal
inscriptions, which may possibly pre-date this monument.
Memorial messages are found on a small number of the Govan monuments.
One 17th century monument contains a religious message which refers to the
resurrection.
HEIR - LYES - IOHN - GLEN - W----- - A-----
DYD - CAPTIVE - BY - FIRST - AD--- - SIN
YET - DYD - IN - HOPE - TO - BE - SET - FREE
BY - SECOND - ADMS - VICTORY
Two of the 18th century monuments contain personal references which praise
certain qualities and express respect for the deceased.
HE WAS AN HONEST MAN
AND AS SUCH RESPECTED
BY ALL THAT KNEW HIM HIS
SON ARCHIBALD IN GREAT
FUL REMEMBERANCE OF HIS
DECEASED FATHER CAUS
ED THIS STONE TO BE SET WP
One monument contains the Latin inscription, MOMENTO MORI, "Remember you must
die", while two of the 19th century monuments contain the Latin inscription
MIHI HODIE TUCRAS, "As I am now you will be tomorrow".
There are surprisingly few 19th century personal epitaphs: One of the Donald
monuments to Agnes Addie who died in America states:
SHE LIVED ENDEAVOURING ALWAYS TO DO HER DUTY
Another states that the owner John Campbell was:
MUCH LOVED AND DEEPLY REGRETTED
The 18th century monuments similarly record the burial of individuals,
married couples and families. One monument records "John Baird his wife and
family". Where the names of married women are recorded, up to the middle of
the 19th century, they retained their maiden surname on marriage as was common
in Scotland. Later, Scottish women adopted their husband's name according to
the English custom. The use of maiden surnames can be useful in showing
relationships between families.
From the later 18th to early 19th centuries, the larger two-piece headstones
record much more information such as names, day, month and year of death,
and age. Other monuments include cause of death and comment on people buried
elsewhere.
HERE LIES THE REMAINS OF
DAVID PARKHILL
WHO LOST HIS LIFE BATHING IN THE
RIVER CLYDE ON THE 6 JUNE 1772
AGED 16 SON OF JAMES
PARKHILL AND SUSANA THOM
Re-use of the Early Mediaeval Monuments
The prominent families were mainly using flatstones where the wider population
where mainly erecting headstones. In 1899, a plan was drawn showing the
position of the older monuments before they were removed. By superimposing
this plan on top of the 1809 plan, it was possible to identify the
lairs in which they stood. This revealed that it was the prominent families
who were reusing the early mediaeval monuments. These families were, in fact,
the 'Govan Heritors' and their descendants whose importance within the
community did not necessarily come from wealth. Many were, in fact, poor,
their status came from the fact that they were landowners.
In the 17th century, it was mainly the nobility and the gentry who could afford
to erect monuments; portioners at the time were not ordinary people. In the
19th century, the improvement in economic conditions meant that more
people had the resources to erect monuments. So why should the Govan gentry
choose to re-use the older mediaeval monuments? The re-use of sites and
monuments is a very ancient custom. People can draw on the power of the past
and ancient rights in order to maintain the own power, especially in times of
social stress. Monuments can be used in a similar way. They are visible evidence
of earlier people and earlier power. Until the modern period when the use of
monuments became standard practice, the use of a monument, however simple,
suggested the person was important. The monument provided an indication of
wealth and status. A very large or elaborate monument could indicate wealth.
Status however, is much more difficult to determine. Memorial monuments are
a valuable source of information about the person or family commemorated.
In choosing a particular type of monument, people can make some kind of
statement about themselves. A memorial monument, therefore, is a status
symbol.
The mediaeval monuments were visibly different ( Ritchie, 1994 ) from the
17th to 18th century flatstones in that they were decorated and this decoration
reflected much older tastes. Therefore, the people reusing the early
monuments were deliberately choosing to adopt these monuments which in some
way connected them to a much older past. At Govan, the families reusing the
mediaeval monuments were among the original heritors and older families.
Clearly they were making a statement about themselves. As the families
acquired lairs in the cemetery, they could use the antiquity and status of
the older monuments to assert their own position both physically and
psychologically.
The reasons as to why this should be important perhaps lie in the use and
ownership of the land. In the 1th century, land holdings were small. But, in
the 17th to 18th centuries, many of these smaller estates were merged to form
larger estates, many of which were owned by the prominent families such as the
Rowans. At the same time, many of the Glasgow businessmen began to acquire
country estates and houses. The owner of the country houses were wealthy as
were the "Govan gentry". Many of the 19th century merchants were descended
from heritors themselves, but had town houses in Glasgow, as did the
Gibsons. Other families, however, had owned land and lived in Govan for
generations, for example, the Rowans, Andersons and Hills.
The re-use of the older monuments was an effective way of expressing ancient
ties to the land and emphasising status. Wealth itself could be a symbol of
status, but it could not compete with the power and prestige gained though
membership of one of these prominent families. The older stones were a visible
reminder to the community of the status and antiquity of these families such
as the Hills and Rowans.
Annan says ( 1878, XIV ) that "These bonnet lairds are mostly gone - gone and
forgotten. Their little freeholds broken up for villas, or lost in some bygone
estate, the very names rubbed off the map. They lie themselves in the old
kirk-yard graves that effeired to their lands." However, in one respect, he
was mistaken. These "lairds" have in some way managed to achieve their desire
to be remembered through the use of the monuments. In choosing to re-use the
early mediaeval monuments, they made a statement about themselves and left
a powerful and visible reminder of themselves and their importance as
"heritors" of the land. They used the stones to ensure that although they
themselves are now gone, they are not forgotten.
Footnotes:
- Glasgow City Archives also hold Kirk Session minute books for 1651-62
and 1710-1820
- For the period from 1723 to 1810, the records of the Heritors of Govan
Parish, held at the Scottish Record Office, are full of concerns about
their burying ground. See Davidson Kelly in Ritchie, 1994, pp. 1-17.
- This image was used in the 1879 promotional calendar of William Barr,
general outfitters, Great Western Buildings, Govan.
Selected References:
- Annan, T. 1870 "The Old Country House of the Old Glasgow Gentry". MacLehose, Glasgow
- Aries, P. 1981 "The Hour of Our Death". Allan Lane, London
- Brian, R. J. 1989 "The Shaping of Scotland. 18th Century Patterns of Land Use and
Settlement". Aberdeen University Press
- Brotchie, T. C. F. 1938 "The History of Govan", Glasgow
- Cutmore, C. 1996 "Memorial Stones in the Kirkyard of Govan" ( unpublished M.A.
dissertation, Glasgow University )
- Donaldson, G. 1995 In James Kirk, ed. "Scotland's History, Approaches and
Reflections". Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh
- Innes, Sir Thomas, of Learney 1934 "Scots Heraldry". Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
- Leishman, M. 1840 "The Parish of Govan" in "New Statistical Account" pp.668-718
- Pollock, J. "The Statistical Account of Scotland", volume 14, pp.281-296
- RCAHMS 1971 Argyll Volume 1, Kintyre. HMSO
- Ritchie, A. ed. 1994 "Govan and its Early Mediaeval Sculpture". Allan
Sutton Publishing, Gloucestershire
- Stirling Maxwell, J 1899 "Sculptured Stones in the Kirkyard of Govan". Glasgow.
- Thomas, C. 1971 "Britain and Ireland in early Christian Times, AD 400-800".
Thames and Hudson, London.
- Willsher, B. & Hunter, D. 1978 "Stones: A Guide to some remarkable
18th century grave stones". Edinburgh, Canongate Publishing
- Willsher, B. 1985 in "Understanding Scottish Graveyards" ed. Edwina
Produfoot, C.S.A., Edinburgh
- Willsher, B. 1985 "How to Record Scottish Graveyards". C.S.A., Edinburgh
- Willsher, B. 1992 "Govan Old Parish Church Graveyard" in "Friends of
Govan Old Parish Church Second Annual Report", pp.16-23
|